HIGHRISE
Page 1 of 1 • Share •
[/img] Re: HIGHRISE
by darwinzzkie on Thu Feb 19, 2009 7:04 pm
ok po ng reflection ng curtainwall.. 
slight suggestion po master pa bawas cguro nung trees sa harap
natakpan kasi ung entrance ng building dna kita.
slight suggestion po master pa bawas cguro nung trees sa harap
natakpan kasi ung entrance ng building dna kita.
darwinzzkie- Guwapingz
- Number of posts: 647
Age: 26
Location: Manila, Aguilar Pangasinan
Registration date: 18/02/2009 
Re: HIGHRISE
by LWF on Thu Feb 19, 2009 8:21 pm
RATING based on a 100pt sore system that I am testing out to make it easier for people who are busy and don't have much rime to leave a comment that at least shows what area of the rendering is good or not so good.
100pts breakdown
20% = modeling (M)
25% = texturing and materials (T)
25% = lighting (L)
10% = entourage (E)
10% = compositon and story (CS)
10% = x-factor or overall wow effect (X)
Multiply this total by the degree of difficulty (0.9 being the simplest model and 1.0 being the hardest/more complex scenes)
So for this rendering:
M = 18
T = 18
L = 19
E = 5
C = 6
X = 5
SUB-TOTAL = 71
Degree of Difficulty = .91
TOTAL SCORE = 64.61
0 - 25 pts = very poor
26 - 50 pts = poor
51 - 65 pts = average
66 - 80 pts = good
81 - 90 pts = very good
91 - 100 pts = excellent
100pts breakdown
20% = modeling (M)
25% = texturing and materials (T)
25% = lighting (L)
10% = entourage (E)
10% = compositon and story (CS)
10% = x-factor or overall wow effect (X)
Multiply this total by the degree of difficulty (0.9 being the simplest model and 1.0 being the hardest/more complex scenes)
So for this rendering:
M = 18
T = 18
L = 19
E = 5
C = 6
X = 5
SUB-TOTAL = 71
Degree of Difficulty = .91
TOTAL SCORE = 64.61
0 - 25 pts = very poor
26 - 50 pts = poor
51 - 65 pts = average
66 - 80 pts = good
81 - 90 pts = very good
91 - 100 pts = excellent
LWF- CGP Newbie
- Number of posts: 60
Age: 27
Location: 17th Ave.
Registration date: 12/12/2008 -
Re: HIGHRISE
by glensky on Thu Feb 19, 2009 10:59 pm
LWF wrote:RATING based on a 100pt sore system that I am testing out to make it easier for people who are busy and don't have much rime to leave a comment that at least shows what area of the rendering is good or not so good.
100pts breakdown
20% = modeling (M)
25% = texturing and materials (T)
25% = lighting (L)
10% = entourage (E)
10% = compositon and story (CS)
10% = x-factor or overall wow effect (X)
Multiply this total by the degree of difficulty (0.9 being the simplest model and 1.0 being the hardest/more complex scenes)
So for this rendering:
M = 18
T = 18
L = 19
E = 5
C = 6
X = 5
SUB-TOTAL = 71
Degree of Difficulty = .91
TOTAL SCORE = 64.61
0 - 25 pts = very poor
26 - 50 pts = poor
51 - 65 pts = average
66 - 80 pts = good
81 - 90 pts = very good
91 - 100 pts = excellent
glensky- CGP Apprentice
- Number of posts: 428
Location: stranded in singapore for 17 yrs
Registration date: 07/10/2008 -
Re: HIGHRISE
by Butz_Arki on Fri Feb 20, 2009 12:24 am
nothing much to say about this...keep practicing nlang...
glensky wrote:LWF wrote:RATING based on a 100pt sore system that I am testing out to make it easier for people who are busy and don't have much rime to leave a comment that at least shows what area of the rendering is good or not so good.
100pts breakdown
20% = modeling (M)
25% = texturing and materials (T)
25% = lighting (L)
10% = entourage (E)
10% = compositon and story (CS)
10% = x-factor or overall wow effect (X)
Multiply this total by the degree of difficulty (0.9 being the simplest model and 1.0 being the hardest/more complex scenes)
So for this rendering:
M = 18
T = 18
L = 19
E = 5
C = 6
X = 5
SUB-TOTAL = 71
Degree of Difficulty = .91
TOTAL SCORE = 64.61
0 - 25 pts = very poor
26 - 50 pts = poor
51 - 65 pts = average
66 - 80 pts = good
81 - 90 pts = very good
91 - 100 pts = excellent
Butz_Arki- Superbeast
- Number of posts: 4040
Age: 30
Location: Guinea Ecuatorial,United States of Africa
Registration date: 19/09/2008 -
Re: HIGHRISE
by arki_vhin on Fri Feb 20, 2009 12:50 am
LWF wrote:RATING based on a 100pt sore system that I am testing out to make it easier for people who are busy and don't have much rime to leave a comment that at least shows what area of the rendering is good or not so good.
100pts breakdown
20% = modeling (M)
25% = texturing and materials (T)
25% = lighting (L)
10% = entourage (E)
10% = compositon and story (CS)
10% = x-factor or overall wow effect (X)
Multiply this total by the degree of difficulty (0.9 being the simplest model and 1.0 being the hardest/more complex scenes)
So for this rendering:
M = 18
T = 18
L = 19
E = 5
C = 6
X = 5
SUB-TOTAL = 71
Degree of Difficulty = .91
TOTAL SCORE = 64.61
0 - 25 pts = very poor
26 - 50 pts = poor
51 - 65 pts = average
66 - 80 pts = good
81 - 90 pts = very good
91 - 100 pts = excellent
angas mo sir ha...jurry k cguro aus sa criteria for judging
arki_vhin- CGP Dabarkads
- Number of posts: 2161
Age: 25
Location: batang caloocan, tinapon sa SG
Registration date: 21/09/2008 -
Re: HIGHRISE
by reggie0711 on Fri Feb 20, 2009 4:55 am
photoshop b toh? prng 3d ha... post more sir! 
gnda composition
gnda composition
reggie0711- CGP Guru
- Number of posts: 1674
Age: 29
Location: philippines
Registration date: 31/10/2008 -
Re: HIGHRISE
by vamp_lestat on Sun Feb 22, 2009 1:21 am
amazing sir... PS rendering ito... galing ng mata nyo sir... kuha nyo po ang pagrender sa PS... great work... para sau.
para sau.
vamp_lestat- CGP Guru
- Number of posts: 1928
Age: 29
Location: Davao City, Philippines
Registration date: 27/11/2008 -
Re: HIGHRISE
by boygeorge on Sat May 09, 2009 7:53 am
LWF wrote:RATING based on a 100pt sore system that I am testing out to make it easier for people who are busy and don't have much rime to leave a comment that at least shows what area of the rendering is good or not so good.
100pts breakdown
20% = modeling (M)
25% = texturing and materials (T)
25% = lighting (L)
10% = entourage (E)
10% = compositon and story (CS)
10% = x-factor or overall wow effect (X)
Multiply this total by the degree of difficulty (0.9 being the simplest model and 1.0 being the hardest/more complex scenes)
So for this rendering:
M = 18
T = 18
L = 19
E = 5
C = 6
X = 5
SUB-TOTAL = 71
Degree of Difficulty = .91
TOTAL SCORE = 64.61
0 - 25 pts = very poor
26 - 50 pts = poor
51 - 65 pts = average
66 - 80 pts = good
81 - 90 pts = very good
91 - 100 pts = excellent
boygeorge- CGP Newbie
- Number of posts: 26
Age: 25
Location: tulay sa navotas
Registration date: 05/05/2009 -
Similar topics» Raining Middle East (Highrise Building)
» concept for a new high rise building
» A MODERN COMPLEX HIGH RISE BUILDING
» High Rise Building NPR version
» Vray 2.0 Second Test
» concept for a new high rise building
» A MODERN COMPLEX HIGH RISE BUILDING
» High Rise Building NPR version
» Vray 2.0 Second Test
Page 1 of 1
Permissions in this forum:
You cannot reply to topics in this forum